Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kristie Ahn vs Katie Swan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ahn vs Swan analysis and find out who is favored!
Kristie Ahn vs Katie Swan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ahn 0 - 0 Swan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ahn has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Swan has won 38.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ahn, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Swan has won 60.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ahn has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Swan has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ahn has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Swan winning 52.17% (W/L 12/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ahn has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 31/ 32). Swan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 20/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ahn has played against opponents with an average rank of while Swan has played against players with an average rank of 269.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ahn has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Swan has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ahn has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Swan has converted 42.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
87
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
512
Rank
118
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
57% (229-174)
Career Total W/L
60% (201-132)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (4-5)
$648,274
Career Prize Money
$221,866
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kristie Ahn vs Katie Swan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ahn VS Swan
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kristie Ahn | Katie Swan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (89/90) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 176.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (326/534) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (215/326) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (81/208) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (36/85) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (293/630) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Kristie Ahn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Yuki Naito
Player
Kristie Ahn
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Kristie Ahn
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Kristie Ahn
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristie Ahn
Player
Nicole Melichar
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
15
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Na-Lae Han
Player
Kristie Ahn
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Kristie Ahn
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristie Ahn
Player
Heather Watson
64%
(
70 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
1
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
116
|
2-6 7-6(3) 8-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Kristie Ahn
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kristie Ahn
Player
Ekaterine Gorgodze
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristie Ahn
Player
Caroline Dolehide
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Katie Swan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Melisa Ercan
Player
Katie Swan
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Katie Swan
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Melisa Ercan
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Xiaodi You
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Katie Swan
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Katie Swan
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Katie Swan
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Katie Swan
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
43
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ahn Vs Swan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ahn are available here and Swan photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
